Jenna Fizel

Global Head of Emerging Technology

IDEO

Headshot of Jenna Fizel

Don't watch AI — build with it.

Maker-technologist who demystifies. Hands-on and hype-allergic.

Jenna Fizel leads IDEO's Emerging Technology practice, working across computational design, XR and digital fabrication. Her instinct is to make new technology tangible fast. At SXSW she ran a session where the audience used custom AI tools to collectively author a manifesto in the room — the point being that participation teaches you things spectating never will. At last year’s Summit she ran a lively experiment on collective decision making and perspective taking with AI involved. Chaotic, yes, but we learned a lot!

Her recent writing with Savannah Kunovsky makes an argument we support: AI does not think like us, and that is precisely what makes it worth designing with. The gap is the useful part, not a defect to be engineered away.

"Build to find out" is designing under uncertainty as a working method — using tools as probes into questions you cannot answer in advance.

You'll take away: the confidence to stop waiting. She'll show you how to run a small, cheap experiment against a question you have been churning forever, and how to interpret the result — the antidote to organizations still forming a committee about AI strategy.

ONE READ — "AI doesn't think like us. That's what makes it worth designing with," IDEO Edges, with Savannah Kunovsky.

Summit 2026

Saturday ·

1:45pm – 2:45pm

Parallel session

The Couch (main auditorium)

Designing for interactions beyond the keyboard. Thinking about robotics, multimodality and social relationships as design materials for AI.

Saturday ·

7:45pm – 8:30pm

Panel

The Couch (main auditorium)

Jamer Hunt’s challenge from last year’s Summit, taken seriously, landed.

Summit 2025

Saturday ·

2:00pm

What if large language models could change the very way we come to agreement? In this social experiment, Jenna Fizel of IDEO uses an LLM to help us co-author a vision for human-AI collaboration, shifting the conditions of how collective meaning takes shape. The outcome might be awesome, boring, weird, or something else entirely — but the point is the experience of finding new ways to make societal-scale decisions.